Back To Contents

 

Searching for Archival Records

 

In this place I wish to mention archives known, believed or suspected to possess material relating to the Bartalos Family. In historical Hungary most large archives were established by the state and other administrative agencies and their primary role was to preserve documents from their respective jurisdiction.

 

As we traced back our ancestors over some eight hundred years, we found the largest number of the old documents in the Hungarian National Archives in Budapest. While these documents were originally produced and kept in two other locations that were geographically close to where our predecessors lived, namely the religious chapters (kaptalani hivatal)in Gyor and Pozsony, either the original documents or their copies eventually found their way to the central archives in Budapest.

For sake of completeness below the reader is provided with the addresses of the principal archives where documents generated in the Csallokoz are expected to be found

 

1. Regional state archive in Bratislava (Pozsony), Slovakia

 

STATNY OBLASTNY ARCHIV V BRATISLAVE,

81104 Bratislava,

Krizkova c. 7,

Slovakia

 

2. Regional state archive in Gyor , Hungary

 

GYORI MEGYEI JOGU VAROS LEVELTARA,

9022 Gyor ,

Rakoczi Ferenc ut 1.

Hungary,

Telephone: (011) 36-96-312 288,

Fax: (011) 36-96-518-743,

web site: http://www.vleveltar.gyor.hu/

e-mail:leveltar@enternet.hu

 

3. Archive(s) in Komarom ( Hungary )/Komarno ( Slovakia ) - This city today consists of two parts, the left bank of the Danube river belongs to Slovakia while the right is Hungary . Both call themselves by the same name in their respective languages, i.e. Komarno in Slovak, Komarom in Hungarian. So far I did not have the opportunity to look into the whereabouts of archival collections in this divided city or sister cities.

 

4. National archives in Budapest

 

MAGYAR ORSZAGOS LEVELTAR,

1014 Budapest,

Becsi kapu ter 2-4,

Telephone: (011)36-1-356-5811,

Fax: (011) 36-1-212-1619,

website: www.natarch.hu ,

e-mail: info@natarch.hu

 

5. National state archive in Bratislava (Pozsony), Slovakia . (Szlovak Nemzeti Leveltar - in Hungarian)

 

SLOVENSKY NARODNY ARCHIV,

Bratislava , Slovakia

 

Among these places, we found the National Archives in Budapest the most helpful. The diversity and depths of their collection, the good catalogs, efficient retrieval and reproduction, if needed, and easy accessibility of the city by airplane made it our first choice. Not only were we able to study their own collection but they also had on microfilm records of the religious chapters (kaptalani hivatal) of Gyor and Pozsony/Bratislava.

 

 

CONDUCTING FAMILY RESEARCH IN THE M.O.L.

(HUNGARIAN NATIONAL ARCHIVES)

 

Address:  Magyar Orszagos Leveltar

1014 Budapest

Becsi kapu ter 2-4

Phone - info: (+36 1)356-58-11

(+36 1) 356-58-116

e-mail: info@natarch.hu

webpage www.natarch.hu

 

The most likely source of information on a Hungarian noble family is the National Archives of Hungary. The Hungarian name of this institution is "Magyar Orszagos Leveltar" (MOL) and its main offices are located in an imposing building in the Buda Castle area of Budapest .  In order to gain access to archival material one need to obtain an individually numbered Research Visitor's Permit (Kutatoi Latogatojegy). The visitor is directed by one of the guards to the official who is empowered to issue such permit. One is asked about the nature of the information sought (do you merely want to visit the library, consult various data bases or wish to study actual documents), your background to conduct the planned study and finally for identification ( US passport is acceptable) before permit is given. With the permit one is provided a brief explanation of the facilities, hours of operation, the mode of organization of stored materials, the procedure of requesting material, the mode of having copies made, etc. Since much of this information can be found also on the website of the MOL (www.natarch.hu) both in English and Hungarian, one can save time by studying it in advance.  Once having the permit and passing into the building's interior, you will still have questions, both procedural and related to your research findings. As long as your requests and questions are reasonable and rendered in a polite manner the employees and researchers are very approachable, knowledgeable, ready to help and do not accept any monetary compensation for it. (Attention fellow New Yorkers: Demanding attitude, disregard for the time of the employee or expecting them to do your work will get you nowhere here. Remember, your visitor's privilege is rescindable at any time!)

 

Nature of information

 

Databases.(CDs, books and archival collections) The Bartalos family is mentioned in several books on Hungarian nobility (see compiled list of books) and members of the family are listed in the conscriptions of nobles held in 1724, 1754-1756 and 1842. It is present in such databases as the socalled "Illesy Gyujtemeny" and "Daroczy Gyujtemeny".   Such data can help to establish the nobility of a family and to indicate he geographical distribution of its members as a function of time.  Among published works the single most complete database on Hungarian nobility was compiled by Bela Kempelen which appeared in some 12 volumes beginning in 1911 and continuing into the 1930s. It is entitled "Magyar nemes csaladok" (in English: "Hungarian noble families") and provides information on close to 120,000 families. It is now available also on CD and can be ordered from www.arcanum.hu.  Other data bases from the MOL made available by Arcanum on CD include the "Kiralyi Konyvek" 1527-1683 (in English: Royal Books), which is a collection of documents issued by the Royal Office, the "Illesy Gyujtemeny" (see above),and "Magyar kozepkori adattar" (Hungarian Medieval Database) by Pal Engel. As new titles are added constantly, it is worth checking the Arcanum web site periodically.

The single most complete and thereby most valuable work for family researchers is a DVD published by Arcanum and entitled “DVD Konyvtar IV. Csaladtortenet – heraldika –honismeret.(In English: DVD Library No. 4, Family History – Heraldry – Homeland Privity”).

 

Granting documents. Data like these, however, give little information about the origin and mode of continuity of the family, the lives and achievements of individual family members, and how people were affected by and reacted to rapid and drastic changes in their environment. Indeed, it would be very satisfying to discover diaries or at least letters from long lived family members recording their thoughts, emotions and contemplated actions in response to the happenings around them. Or to have an ancestor with artistic bent who recorded events in his/her life in poems, short stories or illustrations.   Since the opportunity to such intimacy with one’s ancestors is rarely given, we need to discover other aspects of their life that might be recorded and thus  could provide indirect evidence about the way they looked at life and lived it.

 

The document from the king or his representative which announced the elevation of a subject or subjects to the status of nobility almost always gave the reason for such promotion. If the reason is spelled out in some details that can be the source of important information on the life of the rewarded and, at times, his entire family.

 

Records of land transactions. The designation of "landed nobility (“Kurialis nemes” in Hungarian) refers to nobles who possessed a noble's estate with a manor house. (In Hungarian “Kuria” is thedesignation for a noble's manor house). In those days the owing and thus selling and buying real estate was a privilege of the nobles and the church. In medieval Hungary the kings assigned the tasks of recording real estate transactions to certain regional ecclesiastical offices or chapters.  These offices were usually named "capitulum" (literally little head in Latin) in the contemporary Latin language documents (and "Kaptalan" in Hungarian). Record keeping of real estate transfers began in Hungary in the late 1100s. The practice however was spotty until 1231 when a royal edict institutionalized and standardized the practice of authentication of real estate transaction by ecclesiastical chapters.  These church offices had to be available to receive clients during regular hours, to record testimonies, to conduct site visits at the order of the king's office, to investigate disputes of territoriality and establish land boundaries, to visit those who wish to make their last testament, to issue certificates of their findings and decisions, to maintain an archive of their records and to produce copies of their documents. The surviving records in the archives of several of these institutions eventually became incorporated into state owned archival collections. To the extent they have been preserved, they represent a veritable source of information on the changing fortunes of a landed family and, by recording transfer of land by inheritance and marriage, on their family tree as well.

 

Records of legal proceedings, minutes of the general assembly of nobles (held in each county yearly), and the records of the collectors of taxes and assessments represent still other potential sources.  For more recent data records of military recruitment might also be consulted with benefit. One can search for such data in regional archives and in the national archive,

 

Family archives. Records on paper are fragile and are easily destroyed by such calamities as fire, floods, rodents and other pests and by improper storage and handling.  Until very recently beside paper, only the much more expensive parchment was available to record important information. Because of the high rate of loss of such documents, the chapters (ecclesiastical land offices), courts and administrative offices kept a copy of the records they issued. When land ownership was challenged the burden of proof was on the challenged. The challenged had to prove ownership by certificates. If his certificate was lost or destroyed and the pertinent records in the Chapter's office were likewise unavailable, he might have to give up the ownership of the disputed land. Thus the landed nobles had an incentive to preserve those papers that allow to trace the ownership of their land. Thus the explanation for the origin and persistence of family archives in the Middle Ages. If such a family archive is discovered in your family, it can be an invaluable source of information on the land of the family and indirectly on the members of the family.

 

While I knew that our family must have maintained a family archive, I never heard about one that survived to our time.  The area where they lived served as a battle ground between the Muslim Turks and the Western Christian forces for some 150 years resulting in much destruction to life and property. We know of a fire in 1699 that destroyed the entire settlement of Szap, including their church while Mad and its Calvinist church were destroyed by another fire in 1847.  In the early 1700s the Rakoczy Rebellion affected the area, in 1810s Napoleon's hostile soldiers marched through the area , in 1848 some of the battles of the fight for independence from Austria took place here, during World War II the Russian Red Army advanced through it and, periodically, interspersed with human destruction, the Danube river flooded the villages and their lands. Over the centuries the people remained but their environment was repeatedly destroyed and rebuild. In contrast to large cities in the area, such as Bratislava or Gyor where even structures built by the Romans some 2000 years ago still do exist, in the villages of lower Csallokoz the presence of buildings, other than churches, which are more than 100 years old are a rarity.  I made the assumption that between the numerous man made calamities and natural catastrophes, the family papers, like the old buildings and their contents, have been destroyed. In fact, the only artifact known to me that have been preserved from any of my Bartalos ancestors is a chalice in the Calvinist church of Szap engraved "…..the noble Judith Szabo wife of the noble Mariny Bartalos…." and the year 1820. They were my grandfather's grandparents.

Was I in for a surprise!

 

The trail of Bartalos papers

 

In the Summer of the year 2000, while in Budapest , I walked into the building housing the main offices of the Hungarian National Archives and inquired about the resources available to non-professionals interested in conducting family research. That was the beginning. Soon data were forthcoming on certification of nobility in different counties in the 1700s, on a royal land donation in 1655 in Nagy Mad to seven male members of the “Barthalos family” and some law suits involving members of the “noble Barthalos family”. With assistance in Slovakia we were also able to trace our family lineage to one of the 1655 awardees, Gyorgy (George Barthalos). The facts that these awardees were referred to as nobles in the award document, and records from the late 1500s indicated that noble Barthalos families lived in manor houses in at least three locations (Nagy Mad, Varbogya and Szap) in the area called Csallokoz, it was clear that their nobility was of more ancient origin. The breakthrough occurred when one of the catalogues listed a microfilm with Barthalos documents in the collection of the late Kalman Daroczy, a well-known genealogist and publicist. The microfilm was located in Budapest at the National Archives and there we found several handwritten pages, apparently by Mr. Daroczy, of diverse genealogical information on Barthalos family members mostly from the 1700s. None of these appeared to be new or of great significance for my research.  One notation, however, cought my eyes. It made reference to his records on the Bogyay family.  Subsequent search of the Daroczy notes on the Bogyay family led us to a letter written in 1935 by a Mr. Elemer Bogyay to Mr. Daroczy informing him that he, with the concurrence of his brothers, in 1906, deposited over 2000 family papers to the archives of the Hungarian National Museum in Budapest and that those records date back to 1200s. This was a most exciting news, because the Bogyay family is a branch of the Barthalos family which began breaking away in the 1600s and established themselves in the 1700s in Zala county. The break become complete when a family member, Gyorgy Bogyay aliter Barthalos, captain of the castle of Sumeg , received a royal donation, new nobility and new coat of arms. Thus some of those records referred to in Mr. Elemer Bogyay’s letter must antedate the time of the schism of the family and thus must pertain to our shared past.  The initial elation caused by the discovery of this letter was followed by doubts about the survival of these documents. After all, almost 100 years passed since these records were turned over. Since 1906 the archival collection of the National Museum was transferred to the National Archives that subsequently suffered severe damage to its facilities and destruction of archival materials during the Soviet siege of Budapest in World War II and again during the Red Army’s suppression of the Hungarian Freedomfight in 1956.  Did the Bogyay/Bartalos documents survived these calamities?  Further research will tell.

 

Organization of the Bogyay family archive

 

The news were good. The Hungarian National Archives is an excellent custodian of the material entrusted to it. The material deposited by the Bogyays with the Archive's predecessor some 95 years ago has been  preserved in its entirety! The collection is housed at the Magyar Orszagos Leveltar, (this is the official Hungarian name of the Hungarian National Archives) and it is carried in their books as the archives of the Bogyay family.  Luckily this material escaped damage both in 1945 and 1956!

 

In Hungarian historical research the year 1526 is used to mark the end of the Middle Ages. This was the year when the Turkish forces of Sulejman the Magnificant won a deciding battle against the army of the Hungarian King Louis II near the city of Mohacs where some 20,0000 Hungarian fighters lost their life, among them the King himself. According to established practice the Hungarian National Archives divides its material into two main categories, pre-1526 and post-1526. Accordingly, the Bogyay family’s material has been partitioned into these two divisions. In order to locate these documents you need to consult two directories, as one lists the material in the pre-1526 collection and the other the post-1526 collection. The desired documents need to be requested at least one day in advance. The material received for study is delivered into a well lit, quiet research room where several employees are present at all times to provide assistance and supervision. Copies can be obtained of most archival material for a fee.

 

The pre-1526 material, in general, is less numerous, more fragile and of greater historical value than those produced later. For these reasons you are not allowed to handle these records, but are supplied with good quality photographic pictures of them for study.  The pre-1526 documents are numbered individually, like books in a library, and are prefixed by “DL”followed by several digits. If a certain document is desired, the system in current use requires one to indicate on the request form the family’s name and/or code (i.e. Q 46 for Bogyay) and to give the alphanumeric code for the document(s) requested.

 

The post-1526 material however, needed a different approach to organize it due to the large number of individual documents with many consisting only of a single sheet of paper. The method adapted consists of grouping the documents into bundles (in Hungarian “csomok”). Within each bundle there are file folders. The folders contain documents originating from the same year. The file folders are kept in chronological order within the bundle and the bundles are in chronological order within the family’s collection. Thus a given post-1526 document cannot be identified and referred to by a single alphanumeric code (although with barcoding computer technology this too might change). Today, when desiring a post-1526 document one has to identify the collection (i.e. P 61 - Bogyay,) and the bundle number. Once you are provided with the requested bundle(s) you open it and look for the folder marked with the year when the desired document was produced. Inside that folder you will likely find your document. If you are conducting an exploration, you can check what kind of documents are inside certain folders or within an entire bundle. (This was the method I employed in surveying the content of the Bogyay bundles.)

 

Contents of the Bogyay family archive

 

A few words are in order about the nature of material preserved in these family archives. As it was stated earlier, in the middle ages the family had the primary responsibility to preserve and when needed to produce records of ownership to their real properties. When land was sold, donated, inherited, pawned or ownership was transferred by any legal means the papers documenting previous ownership was given to the new owner. Thus the material in the Bogyay archives included documents beginning in the 1200s dealing mostly with past transfers of the lands they came to possess. The bulk of the documents in their collection has to do with lands they received in Zala and neighboring counties. Many other documents, however, reflected on the early history of the Bartalos family. In the post-1526 collection only the first two “bundles” and the elenchus (list of selected items from the contents) appeared to be of interest to someone who is not researching the Bogyay family. All documents in the pre-1526 collection were screened for their relevance to the Bartalos family and analyzed for content as far as their condition permitted. A copy was obtained from the Archives of the microfilm together with a set of photographic enlargement of all material available. Among the post-1526 records all the material in bundles one and two were checked individually and those with information on the Barthalos family where analyzed, notes were taken and of several photocopies were obtained. Professional help utilized in the translation of these documents from Latin and in the case of several post-1526 documents from medieval Hungarian into modern Hungarian. An English transcript was made of most of these by me (Michael K. Bartalos).

 

Back To Contents